Keep up with the latest FinTech and private market news, business tips, and thought leadership from industry leaders, mentors, and professionals.
Join our mailing list to receive information on upcoming Helicap platform updates and webinars.
If you're excited about the potential of private markets and fintech, we've got a job for you.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, an offer, or a solicitation to invest in any financial product. Investment products offered by Helicap Securities or Helicap Investments are available only to verified Accredited Investors as defined under the Securities and Futures Act 2001. If you are not an Accredited Investor, the investment products referenced in this article are not available to you. All investments carry risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Singapore’s startup ecosystem has matured rapidly over the past decade. Today, the country is home to a large and active innovation network, with more than 4,000 tech startups, 400 venture capital firms, and 220 incubators and accelerators listed through Startup SG Network.
As fundraising conditions have become more selective, founders are increasingly turning to venture debt for growth capital beyond equity. Recent institutional analysis shows that technology growth and venture debt transactions in the United States alone totaled around US$35 billion in 2024, with European growth and venture debt markets estimated at about €17 billion and growing more than 25% year on year, underscoring how minimally dilutive debt has become a key tool for extending runway when equity is harder and more expensive to raise.
As fundraising conditions have become more selective, founders are increasingly turning to venture debt for growth capital beyond equity. In recent years, aggregate venture debt deal value surged past $53 billion in 2024, a record high, as growth-stage startups seek minimally dilutive capital in an environment where equity has become harder and more expensive to raise.
Venture debt is a form of debt financing provided to venture-backed startups and growth companies. Unlike equity financing, it allows a company to raise capital without issuing a large number of new shares and without immediately diluting existing shareholders.
Venture debt financing usually takes the form of a term loan or structured credit facility extended to a startup that has already raised institutional equity capital. The lender assesses not only current financial performance but also growth potential, investor backing, cash runway, and the company’s ability to raise capital in the future.
Many venture-backed startups do not yet fit the lending criteria of traditional banks. They may still be loss-making, have limited hard assets, or be reinvesting heavily in product and growth. Venture debt providers fill part of that gap by underwriting the company more holistically.
For founders, this makes venture debt useful as a form of startup debt financing that can bridge the period between fundraising rounds, fund expansion, or provide liquidity during a tougher equity market.
Venture debt financing works by providing a startup with a loan, usually after it has raised initial venture capital, that is repaid over time through interest and principal. Depending on the structure, the facility may also include warrants, covenants, and an initial interest-only period.
The diagram below shows how the structuring of venture debt financing works.
A typical structure for venture debt financing includes a repayment plan, lender protections, and other terms designed to balance growth financing needs with credit risk. In some cases, it may also include features that give the lender a limited share in the company’s upside, alongside its contractual loan return.
The facility may also include warrants or another equity-linked instrument that gives the lender limited participation in future upside. This feature helps align the lender’s return with the company’s growth trajectory and can support a structure that is more flexible than standard unsecured business lending.
The exact structure of venture debt financing can vary depending on the lender, the company’s growth stage, and the jurisdiction. Even so, the main purpose remains consistent. Venture debt complements equity by adding debt capacity to a business that has growth potential but may not yet qualify for conventional lending.
Typical venture debt terms may include:
For founders, the key may be to assess the full package, not only the headline pricing. A lower rate may still come with tighter covenants or more restrictive terms.
Venture debt and venture capital differ mainly in ownership, repayment, and investor return. Venture debt is loan financing that must be repaid and is usually less dilutive, while venture capital is equity financing that does not require repayment but reduces existing ownership.
This distinction matters because each option creates a different trade-off. Venture capital reduces ownership but avoids repayment pressure, while venture debt preserves equity but adds fixed repayment obligations.
Venture debt is typically structured around repayment, lender protections, and limited upside participation, while venture capital is structured around ownership, long-term value creation, and a share of future exit returns.
The table below shows the main distinctions between venture debt and venture capital.
For most companies, the decision is not venture debt versus venture capital in absolute terms. The two often work together. Equity absorbs early-stage risk, while venture debt can improve capital efficiency between rounds.
Startups usually use venture debt to close any financing gap between where the business is today and where it needs to be before the next equity round. That makes venture debt particularly important in markets where equity capital is available, but timing, valuation, and fundraising conditions are less predictable.
In Southeast Asia, that funding gap between a startup’s current position and the milestones it needs has become more relevant as venture funding has slowed. Southeast Asia tech funding fell roughly 33% in 2025 to its lowest level in nine years, with debt emerging as the top funding route as venture capitalists prioritised selectivity. In that environment, venture debt has become a more practical way for startups to extend runway and keep moving towards the next equity milestone.
From a credit perspective, venture debt works best when it is used to finance a defined milestone, not to offset a broken funding model. That may include supporting working capital during a period of growth or bridging the business to stronger operating metrics.
The strongest candidates for venture debt tend to have institutional equity backing, a credible liquidity plan, and a clear use of proceeds tied to business performance. A 2025 analysis of early-stage venture debt notes that lenders usually focus on startups that have recently closed institutional rounds and can service debt without consuming a large share of their cash burn.
For startups, venture debt is usually used to:
For investors, the relevance is broader. Venture debt sits within the wider private credit market, where underwriting discipline, downside protection, and structuring remain central to risk-adjusted returns.
Venture debt is becoming more relevant in Singapore and Southeast Asia because startups still need growth capital, even as the region’s fundraising environment remains selective.
According to a Southeast Asia Startup Funding Report: 2025 report, equity dealmaking in Southeast Asia only ticked up modestly in the second half of 2025 after a prolonged contraction. In that context, venture debt offers growth-stage companies a way to finance their growth while preserving flexibility on timing and valuation.
Venture debt provides startups in Southeast Asia with an additional source of capital when equity funding is harder to secure or less attractive on current terms. Equity investments in the region fell 20.7% year on year in the first half of 2025 to USD 1.85 billion, the lowest level in more than six years. In this context, demand for debt-based growth capital has increased, allowing founders to manage dilution more carefully and bridge the business to a stronger position ahead of the next fundraising cycle.
Asia has been one of the fastest-growing venture debt markets worldwide, with the sector expanding at a compound annual rate of about 75% between 2018 and 2024 as founders increasingly combine equity with less‑dilutive debt in their capital stacks. The report highlights that startups in the region are using venture debt to extend cash runway, fund expansion, and create buffers against fundraising delays, positioning debt‑based facilities as a structural—not just cyclical—feature of how growth‑stage businesses in Asia finance scale.
In an effort to build the venture debt landscape, the Singapore government introduced a robust Venture Debt Programme (VDP) to provide funding to local early-stage and high-growth small and medium-sized enterprises for business growth and development. This ultimately encouraged local banks to move towards providing venture debt as a funding option for startups. In 2025, venture debt accounted for 7% of total fintech funding in ASEAN, up from a negligible share just a few years earlier, highlighting how founders and investors are increasingly using venture debt and private credit to support growth as equity dealmaking remains selective.
Government support matters because it expands lending capacity to startups that may not fit conventional bank credit models. Under the programme, participating financial institutions can lend to high-growth companies with a risk-sharing ratio of 50%, rising to 70% for eligible young enterprises.
Venture debt providers are the institutions that lend capital to venture-backed startups, while venture debt funds are pooled investment vehicles that deploy investor capital into those loans. The market includes banks, specialist venture debt lenders, and private credit managers, each with a different cost of capital, underwriting approach, and return target.
Venture debt providers generally fall into three main groups:
Each provider type has a different cost of capital, underwriting style, and risk appetite. For startups, the right partner depends on the business model, stage of growth, funding history, and intended use of proceeds.
Helicap’s role in this landscape can be viewed through a private credit approach that seeks to emphasise underwriting discipline, downside protection, and structured financing aligned to a borrower’s cash flow profile, as described in its own private credit insights. In this context, the quality and discipline of the capital provider may matter as much as the capital itself for both founders and investors.
Venture debt funds raise capital from institutional investors, family offices, or accredited investors and deploy that capital into a portfolio of loans to venture-backed companies. Their return is typically generated through interest income, fees, and selective upside from warrants.
It also operates as a portfolio lender, which means underwriting discipline, diversification, downside protection, and active monitoring are central to its strategy. This places venture debt within the broader private credit market, not as a substitute for venture capital, but as a complementary strategy.
Private credit is the broader market within which venture debt operates. Where traditional bank lending is constrained by standardized credit criteria and regulatory capital requirements that many growth-stage companies cannot meet, private credit fills that gap.
It offers structured facilities sized and priced according to the borrower's risk profile. Venture debt is one expression of that model, applied to venture-backed and high-growth businesses.
For growth-stage companies, this means that private credit can offer structured facilities that are calibrated to their actual risk profile rather than applied through a standardised bank lending template.
Private credit, including venture debt, has grown in demand partly because it addresses segments of the market that banks are either unable or unwilling to serve efficiently; a gap created by post-global financial crisis frameworks such as Basel III, which imposed stricter capital requirements that narrowed lending availability for growth-stage businesses. The global venture debt market reflects this demand directly, with total capital raised estimated at around US$49 billion in 2025 and forecast to exceed US$60 billion by 2030, implying a mid‑single‑digit compound annual growth rate over the period.
This matters because not every business is best served by repeated equity rounds. Private credit expands funding options for companies that sit between venture capital and bank lending, while giving investors access to a specialised part of the market.
For investors, venture debt can be accessed in more than one way. The route they choose will depend on their resources, risk appetite, and desired level of involvement.
Institutional investors and family offices sometimes participate through direct mandates or bespoke lending structures. This approach offers greater transparency and control over individual exposures, but it requires meaningful sourcing, underwriting, and monitoring capability. Without that infrastructure, the due diligence burden is significant and ongoing portfolio surveillance becomes difficult to sustain at scale.
A more accessible route for many investors is through a private credit platform or managed fund structure. Through Helicap Securities, accredited and institutional investors may review individual deal opportunities, including direct private credit deals and structured credit facilities, and participate based on their mandate and risk criteria. Each opportunity is supported by Helicap’s in-house deal platform and structuring process, which is designed to support investors with access to deal materials, risk analysis, and ongoing monitoring.
For investors who prefer diversified exposure without deal-by-deal selection, Helicap Investments manages the Helicap Private Credit Fund, an open-ended Singapore-domiciled vehicle focused on senior secured lending to Asia-based fintech lenders and non-bank financial institutions.
Venture debt has become a more established part of the startup financing toolkit in Singapore and across Asia. For founders, it can improve capital efficiency when used carefully. For investors, it can provide access to a specialised area of private credit linked to growth-stage businesses.
What has changed in recent years is the sophistication with which venture debt is being integrated into broader capital strategies. Lenders with genuine underwriting infrastructure, continuous data surveillance, and deep originator relationships are better positioned to manage the inherent risks of this asset class. According to a recent Chambers Private Credit 2026 guide for Singapore, private credit lenders in Asia-Pacific have maintained a disciplined approach characterised by strong documentation, robust collateral packages, and maintenance covenants.
For investors looking to participate in this market, private credit firms can help provide access to direct private credit opportunities, including senior secured debt facilities and structured credit, syndicated to accredited and institutional investors.
For those who prefer diversified exposure without evaluating individual deals, multi‑asset private credit funds offer pooled exposure to similar underlying strategies. These vehicles are often supported by proprietary credit analytics platforms that ingest loan‑level and operational data to monitor portfolios, with some managers reporting multi‑year deployment across multiple countries, hundreds of closed deals, and net annual returns in the high single‑ to mid‑teens range, subject to market conditions and strategy.
As Asia’s financing ecosystem matures, venture debt providers, venture debt funds, and private credit investors are likely to remain important participants in supporting startup growth.
To explore how Helicap helps support private credit opportunities across Singapore and Asia, get in touch with us.
Venture debt is a form of debt financing for venture-backed startups and growth companies. It provides capital that must be repaid, usually with interest, and may include warrants or other equity-linked features.
A lender provides a loan to a startup, usually after it has raised equity funding. The company then repays the loan over time under agreed terms.
Venture capital is equity financing and dilutes ownership. Venture debt is loan financing and usually causes less dilution, but it must be repaid.
Venture debt is provided by specialist venture debt funds, banks, bank-affiliated lenders, and private credit investors.
Startups often consider venture debt after raising equity, when they need runway, working capital, or growth financing without raising another immediate equity round.
Startups often use venture debt to reduce dilution, extend runway, finance milestones, and strengthen their position before a future fundraise.
In Singapore, venture debt may be offered through participating financial institutions under Enterprise Singapore-supported schemes, as well as by specialist private credit and venture debt providers.
Neither is inherently better. Venture debt can be more capital-efficient in the right context, while venture capital avoids repayment obligations. The better choice depends on the company’s stage, cash profile, and funding strategy.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or a solicitation to invest in any product or security. Helicap's investment products are available only to verified Accredited Investors under the Securities and Futures Act 2001. All investments carry risk, including the risk of loss of capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should seek independent financial, legal, and tax advice before making any investment decision. Helicap Securities Pte Ltd (CMS licence, dealing in capital market products) and Helicap Investments Pte Ltd (Licensed Fund Management Company — Accredited/Institutional Investors) are regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
.png)
Investment involves risk. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance or returns. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up, and you may not get the full amount you invested. Rates of exchange may cause the value of investments to go up or down.
Any forward-looking statements, prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or economic trends of the markets contained in this material are subject to market influences and contingent upon matters outside the control of Helicap Pte. Ltd. (“Helicap”) and therefore may not be realised in the future. Further, any opinion or estimate is made on a general basis and subject to change without notice. In presenting the information above, none of Helicap, its affiliates, directors, employees, representatives or agents have given any consideration to, nor have made any investigation of the objective, financial situation or particular need of any user, reader, any specific person or group of persons. Therefore, no representation is made as to the completeness and adequacy of the information to make an informed decision. You should carefully consider (i) whether any investment views and products/ services are appropriate in view of your investment experience, objectives, financial resources and relevant circumstances. You may also wish to seek financial advice through a financial advisor or and independent legal, accounting, regulatory or tax advice, as appropriate.
