Keep up with the latest FinTech and private market news, business tips, and thought leadership from industry leaders, mentors, and professionals.
Join our mailing list to receive information on upcoming Helicap platform updates and webinars.
If you're excited about the potential of private markets and fintech, we've got a job for you.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, a recommendation, an offer, or a solicitation to invest in any financial product. Any investment products referenced are offered only to verified Accredited Investors and Institutional Investors (each as defined in Section 4A of the Securities and Futures Act 2001). Dealing services are provided by Helicap Securities Pte. Ltd., and fund products are managed by Helicap Investments Pte. Ltd. If you are not an Accredited Investor or Institutional Investor, the investment products referenced in this article are not available to you. All investments carry risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Singapore’s startup ecosystem has matured rapidly over the past decade. Enterprise Singapore's Startup SG Network brings together more than 4,000 tech startups, 400 venture capital firms, and 220 incubators and accelerators, which reflects a large and active innovation network.
As equity fundraising has become more selective, some founders have turned to venture debt as a source of growth capital alongside equity. Growth-stage startups increasingly seek potentially less dilutive capital in an environment where equity has become harder and more expensive to raise.
Venture debt is a form of debt financing provided to venture-backed startups and growth companies. Unlike equity financing, it allows a company to raise capital without issuing a large number of new shares and without immediately diluting existing shareholders.
Venture debt financing usually takes the form of a term loan or structured credit facility extended to a startup that has already raised institutional equity capital. The lender assesses not only current financial performance but also growth potential, investor backing, cash runway, and the company’s ability to raise capital in the future.
Many venture-backed startups do not yet fit the lending criteria of traditional banks. They may still be loss-making, have limited hard assets, or be reinvesting heavily in product and growth. Venture debt providers fill part of that gap by underwriting the company more holistically.
For founders, this makes venture debt useful as a form of startup debt financing that can bridge the period between fundraising rounds, fund expansion, or provide liquidity during a tougher equity market.
Venture debt financing works by providing a startup with a loan, usually after it has raised initial venture capital, that is repaid over time through interest and principal. Depending on the structure, the facility may also include warrants, covenants, and an initial interest-only period.
The diagram below shows how the structuring of venture debt financing works.
A typical structure for venture debt financing includes a repayment plan, lender protections, and other terms designed to balance growth financing needs with credit risk. In some cases, it may also include features that give the lender a limited share in the company’s upside, alongside its contractual loan return.
The facility may also include warrants or another equity-linked instrument that gives the lender limited participation in future upside. This feature helps align the lender’s return with the company’s growth trajectory and can support a structure that is more flexible than standard unsecured business lending.
The exact structure of venture debt financing can vary depending on the lender, the company’s growth stage, and the jurisdiction. Even so, the main purpose remains consistent. Venture debt complements equity by adding debt capacity to a business that has growth potential but may not yet qualify for conventional lending.
Typical venture debt terms may include:
For founders, the key may be to assess the full package, not only the headline pricing. A lower rate may still come with tighter covenants or more restrictive terms.
Venture debt and venture capital differ mainly in ownership, repayment, and investor return. Venture debt is loan financing that must be repaid and is usually less dilutive, while venture capital is equity financing that does not require repayment but reduces existing ownership.
This distinction matters because each option creates a different trade-off. Venture capital reduces ownership but avoids repayment pressure, while venture debt preserves equity but adds fixed repayment obligations.
Venture debt is typically structured around repayment, lender protections, and limited upside participation, while venture capital is structured around ownership, long-term value creation, and a share of future exit returns.
The table below shows the main distinctions between venture debt and venture capital.
For most companies, the decision is not venture debt versus venture capital in absolute terms. The two often work together. Equity absorbs early-stage risk, while venture debt can improve capital efficiency between rounds.
Startups usually use venture debt to close any financing gap between where the business is today and where it needs to be before the next equity round. That makes venture debt particularly important in markets where equity capital is available, but timing, valuation, and fundraising conditions are less predictable.
In Southeast Asia, that funding gap has become more relevant as the venture environment has grown more selective. Private funding has concentrated in later-stage and Digital Financial Services deals, while early-stage funding has continued to contract, according to e-Conomy SEA 2025. This environment may increase the appeal of less dilutive financing for some founders seeking to extend runway between equity rounds.
From a credit perspective, venture debt works best when the borrower can service and repay it on its own trajectory, rather than relying on an uncommitted future equity round to offset a funding gap, according to OCC guidance on venture lending. That may include supporting working capital during a period of growth or bridging the business to stronger operating metrics.
The strongest candidates for venture debt tend to have institutional equity backing, a credible liquidity plan, and repayment capacity that does not depend on consuming a large share of their cash burn. In assessing these loans, lenders typically weigh the quality of a borrower's investors, its projected cash burn relative to cash on hand, and its ability to service the debt, according to the OCC guidance.
For startups, venture debt is usually used to:
For investors, the relevance is broader. Venture debt sits within the wider private credit market, where underwriting discipline, risk management, and structuring remain central to how these facilities are assessed.
Venture debt is becoming more relevant in Singapore and Southeast Asia as startups continue to seek growth capital in a more selective equity-funding environment, where private funding has concentrated in later-stage and Digital Financial Services deals while early-stage funding has continued to contract. In that context, venture debt offers growth-stage companies another way to extend runway, finance expansion, or bridge to a later equity round.
Venture debt gives startups an additional source of capital when equity funding is harder to secure or less attractive on current terms. It is less dilutive than an equity round, though venture debt facilities commonly include warrants or, in some structures, redeemable convertible preference shares, so it is not free of equity-linked features. In a more selective funding environment, this can help founders manage dilution while bridging the business towards its next fundraising cycle.
Venture debt has also become a larger part of the regional funding mix. It accounted for about 7% of ASEAN-6 fintech funding in the first nine months of 2025, up from 3% in 2024 and a negligible share in prior years. That share rose even as total fintech funding contracted, which indicates that founders are making relatively greater use of venture debt within a smaller overall funding pool, rather than a surge in absolute debt volumes.
Singapore has supported venture debt for more than a decade. The government piloted a Venture Debt Programme in 2015 and formally launched it in 2016 with DBS, OCBC, and UOB. The current government-backed framework is the Enterprise Financing Scheme – Venture Debt (EFS-VD), which finances innovative, high-growth enterprises that may lack significant assets for traditional bank collateral, using venture debt with warrants or, under the enhanced programme, redeemable convertible preference shares.
Government support can widen the availability of financing for companies that do not fit conventional bank-credit models. Under the EFS-VD, Enterprise Singapore shares 50% of the risk on an eligible loan with the participating financial institution, rising to 70% for eligible young enterprises. The borrower remains responsible for repaying the full loan amount.
Venture debt providers are the institutions that lend capital to venture-backed startups, while venture debt funds are pooled investment vehicles that deploy investor capital into those loans. The market includes banks, specialist venture debt lenders, and private credit managers, each with a different cost of capital, underwriting approach, and return profile.
Venture debt providers generally fall into three main groups:
Each provider type has a different cost of capital, underwriting style, and risk appetite. For startups, the right partner depends on the business model, stage of growth, funding history, and intended use of proceeds.
Venture debt funds raise capital from institutional investors, family offices, or accredited investors and deploy that capital into a portfolio of loans to venture-backed companies. Their return is typically generated through interest income, fees, and selective upside from warrants.
A venture debt fund also operates as a portfolio lender, which means underwriting discipline, diversification, risk management focus, and active monitoring are central to its strategy. This places venture debt within the broader private credit market, not as a substitute for venture capital, but as a complementary strategy.
Private credit is the broader market within which venture debt operates. Where traditional bank lending is constrained by standardised credit criteria and regulatory capital requirements that many growth-stage companies cannot meet, private credit fills that gap.
It offers structured facilities sized and priced according to the borrower's risk profile. Venture debt is one expression of that model, applied to venture-backed and high-growth businesses.
For growth-stage companies, this means that private credit can offer structured facilities that are calibrated to their actual risk profile rather than applied through a standardised bank lending template.
Private credit, including venture debt, has grown in demand partly because banks have become less willing to lend to some mid-market and growth-stage borrowers, with private credit stepping in as a key lender for firms that do not fit conventional bank-credit models.
This matters because not every business is best served by repeated equity rounds. Private credit expands funding options for companies that sit between venture capital and bank lending, while giving investors access to a specialised part of the market.
For investors, venture debt can be accessed in more than one way. The route they choose will depend on their resources, risk appetite, and desired level of involvement.
Institutional investors and family offices sometimes participate through direct mandates or bespoke lending structures. This approach offers greater transparency and control over individual exposures, but it requires meaningful sourcing, underwriting, and monitoring capability. Without that infrastructure, the due diligence burden is significant and ongoing portfolio surveillance becomes difficult to sustain at scale.
A more accessible route for many investors is through a private credit platform or managed fund structure. Private credit platforms and managed fund structures give eligible investors access to professionally sourced and monitored private-market exposures, typically with deal materials, risk analysis, and ongoing monitoring. For investors who prefer diversified exposure without deal-by-deal selection, pooled private credit fund structures provide access to a professionally managed portfolio across multiple originators and geographies.
Venture debt has become a more established part of the startup financing toolkit in Singapore and across Asia. For founders, it can improve capital efficiency when used carefully. For investors, it can provide access to a specialised area of private credit linked to growth-stage businesses.
What has changed in recent years is the sophistication with which venture debt is being integrated into broader capital strategies. Effective venture debt lending depends on underwriting discipline, active portfolio monitoring, and access to deal origination, all of which help manage the risks inherent in this asset class.
As Asia’s financing ecosystem matures, venture debt providers, venture debt funds, and private credit investors are likely to remain important participants in supporting startup growth.
Venture debt is a form of debt financing for venture-backed startups and growth companies. It provides capital that must be repaid, usually with interest, and may include warrants or other equity-linked features.
A lender provides a loan to a startup, usually after it has raised equity funding. The company then repays the loan over time under agreed terms.
Venture capital is equity financing and dilutes ownership. Venture debt is loan financing and usually causes less dilution, but it must be repaid.
Venture debt is provided by specialist venture debt funds, banks, bank-affiliated lenders, and private credit investors.
Startups often consider venture debt after raising equity, when they need runway, working capital, or growth financing without raising another immediate equity round.
Startups often use venture debt to reduce dilution, extend runway, finance milestones, and strengthen their position before a future fundraise.
In Singapore, venture debt may be offered through participating financial institutions under Enterprise Singapore-supported schemes, as well as by specialist private credit and venture debt providers.
Neither is inherently better. Venture debt can be more capital-efficient in the right context, while venture capital avoids repayment obligations. The better choice depends on the company’s stage, cash profile, and funding strategy.
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, a recommendation, an offer, or a solicitation to invest in any financial product. Any investment product referenced is offered only to verified Accredited Investors and Institutional Investors (each as defined in Section 4A under the Securities and Futures Act 2001). If you are not an Accredited Investor or Institutional Investor, the investment products referenced in this article are not available to you. All investments carry risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
.png)
Investment involves risk. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance or returns. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up, and you may not get the full amount you invested. Rates of exchange may cause the value of investments to go up or down.
Any forward-looking statements, prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or economic trends of the markets contained in this material are subject to market influences and contingent upon matters outside the control of Helicap Pte. Ltd. (“Helicap”) and therefore may not be realised in the future. Further, any opinion or estimate is made on a general basis and subject to change without notice. In presenting the information above, none of Helicap, its affiliates, directors, employees, representatives or agents have given any consideration to, nor have made any investigation of the objective, financial situation or particular need of any user, reader, any specific person or group of persons. Therefore, no representation is made as to the completeness and adequacy of the information to make an informed decision. You should carefully consider (i) whether any investment views and products/ services are appropriate in view of your investment experience, objectives, financial resources and relevant circumstances. You may also wish to seek financial advice through a financial advisor or and independent legal, accounting, regulatory or tax advice, as appropriate.
